GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
I have a digital vernier caliper and reasonable eyesight, AND cross referenced the rotors I sourced from an AE111 importer with actual rotors on my brothers AE111 BZR; they are both 28mm thick, if this is not OEM thickness then so be it, but that's what they are, period. . .
You really should get you eyes tested then coz
a.) Nowhere in the original topic was there mention of swapping to AE111 superstrut brakes. The whole article was geared towards AE101 superstrut brakes. I suggest you re-read it. You have confused the whole conversion by throwing AE111 into the mix.
b.) The AE111 rotors were, in fact, 24mm not 28mm. I have no idea what you have but based on all the info / experience I have they are not AE111 superstrut rotors and are perhaps the reason you have had so much difficulty
GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
I did not overlook that issue - if I had I simply would have got DBA Rotor #708
Why the fvck would you do that???
- 1st you made the assertion that things are gunna start falling apart by using rotors that are too thin.
- I corrected this (not trying to blow my own trumpet but I know this not to be correct) suggesting the important issue is not the thickness of the rotor but rather the diameter so that the pads don't overhang the rotor. Through trial and error I have clearly established that 259mm is the ABSOLUTE minimum diameter rotor for this conversion
- You then make an argument for a smaller rotor??? Can I please have a bucket of what you are on?
GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
Your best suggestion so far.
GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
Not according to DBA catalog AE101 rotors ( # 711) specs are: 20-22mm thick.
No mention has ever been made of DBA711 rotors anywhere in this whole thread why confuse that matter further? Oh I see why.....
OK clearly I made the mistake of assuming that by reference to "AE101" rotors that a reasonably intelligent combatant would understand that I was of course referring to the AE101 SUPERSTRUT rotors since we are, afterall, debating the fitment of superstrut brakes. Clearly this assumption on my part was flawed.
GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
As I said above, that's what I was informed by local Brake outlet. . .
You local brake outlet was wrong!!!
I was bored at work today so I did a little calling around my suppliers and found the following prices (what I would sell these rotors for, RETAIL, based on my cost direct from each of these suppliers)...
PBR - Plenty in stock. Distributed nationally ex Melbourne. Retail $140 each
DBA - Plenty in stock. Distrbuted nationally. Distributed by branches in all eastern states + WA. Retail $230 each
PROTEX (ATAP) - Plenty in stock. Distributed nationally through branches in most states. Retail $125 each
RDA - Plenty in stock - Distributed Nationally through branches in most states. Retail $140 each
RELIANCE (BPA) - Plenty in stock. Distributed nationally. Retail $130
PERSONALLY I would use these rotors on my own car in the following order
DBA
PBR / RDA
PROTEX
RELIANCE
GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
Referring to DBA catalog, specs for 743 rotor are as follows; 255 dia / 46 hgt / 20-22 thk / 54mm ctr / 5 holes.
This is 6mm less than measurement of actual AE111 rotors I had to hand. If this was only issue, I would have gone with 743 rotor and saved myself the admitted hassle of shaving the caliper yolk (= frame caliper hinges off) and knuckle. The reason I did not use DBA 743 was due to listed DIA of 255mm, and the issue of pad overhang.
You refer to this rotor and the need to machine it down to 262mm so it doesn't foul Superstrut caliper but its listed diameter is 7mm less than that - please explain?
Simple really - the DBA catalouge is wrong.
The DBA743 IS 275mm dia * 25mm thick. Try here -
http://www.bpa.com.au/REL_Toyota.pdf
For some reason, I assume a typing error, the specs listed in the DBA catalouge for the DBA743 have changed.
If I could be arsed (I can't be fvcked - I've already handed it all to everyone on a silver platter) I would dig out the pdf file copy I have of an older version of the DBA catalouge that clearly listed the specs as I have stated - It is what I used to research the use of these rotors in the first place. I don't care what your local brake outlet or the CURRENT DBA catalouge say they're wrong. But hey if you don't want to take my word for it, please PLEASE, order a set in and measure them for yourself to test this theory - don't worry you won't have to pay for them when you tell them they are incorrect accord to the DBA catalouge

. I can't wait to see what your next post says if you have the balls to do so.
EVERY other catalouge I have at work indicates they are as per the specs I have just stated. Furthermore I know this to be the case from the 15 or so sets I have bought over the years AND the set I physically measured today!!!
If I could be fvcked I would call DBA to inform them of their error, but I can't.
I no longer own / drive a Corolla and only bother offering up help / advice in this topic because I started it and still get emails / pms asking me questions. If everyone prefers I am quite happy to delete every post (all 8 million odd of them), including the entire brake article and 6 speed conversion article, I have made and not share any of the information I have nutted out for myself in an attempt to help and save people time and money.
GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
Yeah well that wasn't mentioned in the brake guide
Again, re-read the article after you have had your eyes checked........
Under the title
"SUPERSTRUT BRAKES"
Quote
3.) Bit's and pieces :
- Pads for the Superstrut brakes are the same as SW20 MR2 so parts aren't a problem.
- The AE92 flexible brake lines will bolt up to the twin piston calipers.
- The minimum I've tried these brakes under is a ...............
I didn't mention the WRX braided lines because, quite frankly, I forgot about them. They're of little relevance anyway as they're not NECESSARY. They were just a personal choice.
GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
looking at it from a newbies point of view standard AE92 hoses (even if you assume they're long enough) don't really work as the straight hose unions result in the hoses touching the steering knuckle as they turn thru 180deg to swing back behind the strut. This is not necessarily unsafe but I just unsatisfactory in my opinion so i got hoses made up with 45deg bend union which runs hoses up vertically resulting in less bending around strut; yes I spent a few bucks more getting a neater solution - is that so bad???
Nothing wring with you making your brakes look pretty if you wish. I suggest though that whatever brakes it is you have that they are not Superstrut brakes and are perhaps the reason you have had to carry out SO MANY modifications that NO-ONE else has had to do. With all due respect and with this in mind I would suggest that your experience be ignored by all and the simplest plan is to stick with the, much easier to source and fit, AE101 superstrut brake package.
GeeEss, on Dec 7 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
Maybe, but I would not have used AE111 rotors if;
1. DBA catalog had specced 743 rotors with DIA greater than your recommended 262mm, ( a fact queried by sales guy at Weldon's as well) AND
2. If Weldon's Brake had confirmed availability of these rotors.
If the f__k-up was anyone's, it was theirs, not that it changes anything. . . . .
Perhaps you might wish to call the guy at Weldons and inform him he was incorrect on both counts. Up to you really.
Otherwise this has all been covered above.